Thursday, April 25, 2013

Chapter Ten: Final Project 1 - Photojournalist Profile (Lewis Hine)

Firstly, please watch the video of my mock interview with Lewis Hine and find the script I wrote below:


 
 
An interview with Lewis Hine (Script):

Bry:Good evening everyone, my name is Bryony Parker and today we are hypothetically time traveling back to the early 1900’s. I am fortunate enough to steal ten minutes with Mr. Lewis Hine whose investigative photojournalism has been instrumental in transforming child labour laws. So where did this all begin for you Lewis?
Bonnie:Well…I bought my first camera in 1903 and I found a passion for documentary photography early on, especially photographing society’s vulnerable minority groups. While I was studying sociology in New York I had the opportunity to photograph Ellis Island immigrants. Following this assignment, I wanted to expand my horizons further and this type of photography became my primary focus from that moment onwards.

Bry:At this point, the field of photojournalism had already experienced rapid digital changes throughout the 1800’s, for instance, the first negative image, color image, and halftone photograph had all been discovered. As well as the shift from wet plates to dry plates. The majority of your work was black and white. Why did you not experiment with color images?
Bonnie:Firstly, it was very expensive and I was not making a great deal of money from my photographs. Secondly, my images seemed more authentic in black and white. I aimed to capture subjects looking into the camera in an attempt to depict and communicate intimacy to my viewers.

Bry: There is absolutely no doubt that your photographs communicated intimacy. You are notorious for publishing Charities and Commons. What did you hope to achieve with this series of photographs?
Bonnie: My objective all along has been social reform. I wanted to make people aware of the harsh realities, especially pertaining to children in the work place. Through my images I wanted people to "exert the force to right wrongs".
Bry: Your next career move occurred in 1908 when you became employed by the National Child Labor Committee. How was this experience for you?
Bonnie: I had the opportunity to travel a great deal which I really enjoyed. I think I covered approximately 12,000 miles in one year. I primarily documented portraits of children forced to work in factories and mills and the horrendous conditions and treatment they were subjected to.
Bry:Did you face any obstacles or dilemmas when you entered work places? How did the business owners react?
Bonnie:In some instances, I really put myself at risk entering factories, mills, sweat shops, and coal miles. Photographers were certainly not welcomed at any of these institutions. They did not want the public to know what was actually happening behind closed doors. However, I didn’t even give this risk a second thought. I wanted to help these poor kids and ultimately change child labor laws.
Bry:How did you manage to get inside then?
Bonnie:I often had to disguise myself as a fire inspector or insurance agent and hide my camera in order to even get through the door. I really had to put my life on the line in some instances. I was physically harmed and some owners even threatened to kill me.
Bry:Wow and this did not stop you. That is a reflection of your character and really epitomizes your dedication and commitment to the cause.
Bonnie:It wasn’t an easy task. I had to really be discrete, for example, I learned how to essentially write without looking and record captions in my pocket. I have always had a passion for working with children which stems from my early career as an educator. I loved talking to the children and tried to obtain as much information as I possibly could in such a short space of time. Sometimes if my disguise didn’t work, I waited for the children to finish their shifts and even made a number of home visits.
Bry:You stayed with the National Child Labour Committee for eight years. What was your primary motivating force?

Bonnie:I simply wanted to reform child labor laws and I almost felt as if I had a moral responsibility. The environment that these children were forced to work in was dangerous and insanitary. I had to expose the truth behind the working conditions and physical and emotional abuse the children were exposed to. I wanted to give these vulnerable children a voice and make the public aware. My photographs eventually shocked the public and humiliated the government. They had to do something.
Bry:Were there any other factors that influenced and inspired you?
Bonnie: Actually, as a child I worked in similar establishments, for instance, a furniture factory and endured thirteen hour work days six days a week and the pay was disgraceful. My own childhood definitely inspired me to try and make a change.

Bry:I’m really sorry to hear that you experienced similar treatment. But Lewis, your photography was ground breaking and had a profound impact on American society. We are all tremendously grateful and you should be very proud of your work and the effect it has had on society.
Bonnie:I guess you could say that my work helped a little.
Bry:Oh you are so modest. Your work influenced the Keating-Owen Act in 1916. This placed restrictions on children under the age 14 being employed in factories.
Bonnie:Yes this was definitely one of THE highlights of my career. To ultimately help change legislation was incredible. However, despite the long work days and extensive traveling, I was struggling to survive with the microscopic pay scale.
Bry:Like most photojournalists I’m sure your work faced opposition as it was centered on a somewhat controversial topic and the government definitely did not want their system to be exploited.
Bonnie:Without doubt, my images were criticized for not being “shocking enough.” However, I photographed reality and in my opinion accuracy was more likely to get people on board with my social reform campaign.
Bry: Are you aware of your own biases?
Bonnie:Tough question, I probably did not see it at the time. But clearly I was bias against the government and wanted to show the public exactly what was going on and what horrendous treatment the children were experiencing. I understand that employing children to work unsociable hours was extremely profitable. But it really was unsafe.
Bry:Thank you for your time Lewis. Any concluding thoughts you would like to leave us with?

Bonnie:I would just like to end with a segment from the Child Labor Bulletin of 1914. "For many years I have followed the procession of child workers winding through a thousand industrial communities from the canneries of Maine to the fields of Texas. I have heard their tragic stories, watched their cramped lives and seen their fruitless struggles in the industrial game where the odds are all against them. I wish I could give you a bird's-eye view of my varied experience."
Bry:You have definitely opened the nation’s eyes and hearts. I’m sure child labor would still be exactly the same today if you had not taken it upon yourself to try and make a change. The world needs more people like you. Ladies and gentleman, this is Lewis Hine. Thank you for watching. We will be back tomorrow to profile another renowned photojournalist. Don’t miss it.

Next, please refer to the PowerPoint Presentation (below) for a display of Lewis Hine's work and my assessment of the Photographic, Artistic, and Compositional Principles:

 




Works Cited:


 

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Chapter 9 - What Motivates Photojournalists

I couldn’t agree more with Professional photojournalist Mark M. Hancock's words, he referred to “Motivation as an art term. Artists are encouraged to find their creative motivation and meaning of their work before they create,” (source 1). In his blog he also discusses how this notion is unique and personal to each and every individual, very similar to how values are. In other words, my motivations could be similar or very different to yours. It just depends on what is important and why people behave the way they do. While “all photojournalists have the same general purpose - to tell visual stories,” the factors that motivate them are exclusive and are the primary reason they get out of bed each morning. Just from the Module 12 content area alone, I quickly discovered that the featured photojournalists had very divergent yet strong motivational forces governing their work in the field.

Hancock provides a number of categories in which he believes photojournalists fit in to, however, in my opinion these are rather generic and in reality, many more actually exist:
·         “To fulfill the obligation”
·         “To help people”
·         “To answer ‘why?’”
·         “To show the facts”
·         “To inform/educate”
·         “To share the experience”
·         “To achieve”
·         “To prove we existed”
According to Mark Hancock, a freelance photojournalist, helping people is his greatest motivating factor. He finds it tremendously rewarding to document images of those in need so the readers can be exposed to the truth following a natural disaster or crisis. He believes his work helps to achieve a domino effect, if an image of suffering is printed, in turn readers can provide donations to help those in need. The photographs act as a means of connection with the reader and in some instances this can provide aid and assistance and even change laws in extreme cases (source 1). 

Photo created by Mark M. Hancock (2006)

Image Source: http://markhancock.blogspot.com/search/label/award%20winner

Similarly, Lewis Hine was also motivated by reform, particularly helping vulnerable children and ultimately  improving working conditions for children (Module 12 Content Area). Through the use of multiple disguises, Hine secretly exposed the truth behind the dangerous working conditions and physical and emotional abuse the children were subjected to. His objective was to educate the world about child labor and wanted to encourage people to “exert the force to right wrongs.” In other words, Hine wanted stricter laws to be imposed to improve working conditions for children. His work was largely human portraits, he successfully captured subjects looking into the camera in an attempt to depict and communicate intimacy to the viewer. Overall, Hine’s work was groundbreaking and significantly helped the implementation of stricter laws (Module 12 Content Area).


Photo created by Lewis Hine


In contrast, Lynsey Addario is famous for her documentation of issues and sexual discrimination related to women, particularly in Afghanistan. Her goal is to give those women subjected to terrible injustice and gender based violence a voice. The increasing trend of self-immolation – where young women in desperate personal situations commit suicide with boiling water and oil - motivated her to capture this horrific self-infliction of painful disfigurement and deter other women from taking this extreme step,” (source 2). Moreover, through her photographs Lynsey is trying to raise global awareness and show what harsh treatment young women are subjected to in Afghanistan.


Photo created by Lynsey Addario

Overall, the motivations underlying the three photojournalists I selected do not really match up with mine. Unfortunately, nothing on my motivational hierarchy is geared towards changing laws, each factor is specific to where I am currently at in my own life. The closest association I could observe was Mark Hancock’s inspiration to help people. The Graduate Program I am pursing in the fall is Clinical Psychology which is inextricably linked to empathy and helping others.
Below is my personal Motivation Hierarchy (Sorry about it being sideways, it was the correct way on my computer but the blog flipped it around):



Works Cited:
http://markhancock.blogspot.com/2008/05/pj-motivation.html (source 1)

Module 12 Content Area (Lewis Hine)






Monday, April 1, 2013

Chapter 8: Photojournalism and Bias

"Going home"
 
Photo created by Ed Clark (Life Magazine)
 
 
I can almost guarantee that when each of my peers reflect on this picture we will all have a completely different reaction and perception. Personally, when I viewed this image I was immediately drawn to the anguish on the main subject's face. His pain is apparent but we do not know why by just looking at the image alone. The other participants in the background also contribute to the somber mood. The main subject's expression looks genuine and is very heartrending. We can see that that the man depicted in the foreground is in the Navy from the emblem on the cap he wears. As a result, I strongly believe that this may have a more powerful and profound effect on other military personnel and their family members. I have never endured a family member in the military so it is more difficult for me to relate. Individual experiences are inextricably linked to perspective and interpretation. After I researched the context of the photograph I learned that the "navy shipman Graham Jackson is following the funeral train on the occasion of Franklin D. Roosevelt's burial." Therefore, his expression is very fitting for this scenario.
 
Principle 1: Subject’s Expression

The main subject is not overly posed and the anguish and emotion are very clear for everyone to witness. This expression looks natural and genuine and his behavior and body language are professional considering his role as a navy shipman on duty.  
 
Principle 2: What feelings did the image create?

This image was very tough to swallow. Although from the image alone we do not gain insight into the context/situation, the main subject's expression implies extreme tragedy and loss. Also the fact that the man is close to tears adds to the emotional intensity. It is not very often that you see a man close to tears like this.

Principle 3: Contrast Appropriate

The contrast used is very appropriate in the above image. Although it is relatively subtle because the image is in black and white, the main subject is darker than the background participants. This highlights his importance and really draws your attention to his facial expression. In addition to this, the contrast also contributes to the melancholic and somber mood of the photograph.

 


 
Photo created by Jodi Bieber (Time Magazine)
 
 
I remember the story pertaining to the (above) image very well. We discussed it in-depth in an introduction to journalism class. Here is a little bit of context for those of you who are not familiar with the situation. "Bibi Aisha, an 18-year-old woman from Oruzgan province in Afghanistan, fled back to her family home from her husband's house, complaining of violent treatment. The Taliban arrived one night, demanding Bibi be handed over to face justice. After a Taliban commander pronounced his verdict, Bibi's brother-in-law held her down and her husband sliced off her ears and then cut off her nose. Bibi was abandoned, but later rescued by aid workers and the U.S. military,"  (source 1).
 
Why does this represent truth to me?
 
Many people could argue I have my own personal bias or prejudice towards this image due to the fact that I am female. However, in my opinion, it doesn't get much more real than this, regardless of whether you are a male or female. This poor innocent girl was subjected to unimaginable pain and suffering and her scars are there for the whole world to see. This image coincides with Shahidul Alam's activist approach to photojournalism and supports his "Majority World." Women in Afghanistan are simply inferior (for lack of a better word). 
 
However, I fully appreciate that the world is far from equal and there are numerous ways to view things. As a result, opponents could argue that Bibi Aisha deserved this treatment for her defiant behavior towards her husband. Overall, I believe this is a true, accurate, and objective depiction of the potential dangers associated with living in this part of the world. Bibi Aisha is portrayed with dignity and despite everything she has endured, she can hold her head up high, "Opening Doors, Opening Minds." In addition, this image further reinforces the development and progression of the field of photojournalism, previously it was frowned upon to photograph and print portraits of women.
 
Principle 1: Keep it Simple

Bibi Aisha's head shot is the only object in this composition. This is very effective as she receives our undivided attention and there are absolutely zero distractions. Due to the absence of her nose, you are immediately drawn to this part of her face as it is atypical and unnatural.

 
Principle 2: Texture

The place where Bibi Aisha's nose was removed creates intese texture. Although it makes me grimace a little, her now healed scars are evident and always will be. However, the open hole is a harsh reminder of her ordeal. Moreover, the head scarf she wears also contributes texture to the image.

Principle 3: Does the image remind you of any work or photograph you have seen before?
 
This image of Bibi Aisha reminds me of the image (below). Both subjects are young minority girls adhering to specific cultural norms. In each photograph, there is a powerful element that really stands out and draws/lures you in.
 

Photo created by Steve McCurry

Image Source: http://myhigherdrive.com/be-prolific/


 
Photo created by Paulo Whitaker
 
 
This image was taken in May 2008 and illustrates "more than a million gays and transsexuals parading in Brazil's capital Sao Paulo on Sunday in what was billed as the world's largest gay march to urge an end to violence and discrimination," (source 2).
 
Why does this NOT represent truth to me?
 
Although this image is "supposed" to document Brazilian advocates of gay rights and equality, in my opinion this is not a good visual representation and sends out completely the wrong message. The stereotypical rainbow flag is masking the identities of these supporters. The camera angle used her is crucial and further contributes to the inferior stigma. Bettye Lane definitely would not have been satisfied with the portrayal of this minority group and their struggle.
 
 Principle 1: Rule of Thirds
 
This image does not adhere to the rule of thirds primarily because it does not include a main subject. As a result, it is dull and uninteresting and consists only of the colored flag. Disregarding the context and meaning behind the image, it is far from aesthetically pleasing.

Principle 2: Use of Lines

As the viewer, I was imemdiately aware of the distinct vertical lines on the flag. The only purpose they serve is to segregate the colors of the rainbow. The creases within the flag itself add realism and texture to the photgraph. Yet again, the flag is the main focus as there is nothing much else to look at.

Principle 3: Abstraction

The above image is representational of the iconic rainbow symbol assoicated with LGBT. However, we see legs and feet as opposed to the faces of these advocates. This in my opinion is far from appropriate and extremely bias.



Works cited: